The practice of civil forfeiture practice has sparked controversy nationwide due to a series of documented abuses, and such policies have led to important legal battles and legislative changes here in Pennsylvania. This past summer, however, Attorney General Jeff Sessions called for a reinstatement of an old civil asset forfeiture policy. Under the DOJ’s new agenda, the future of local civil forfeiture is anything but certain. Continue reading “What the DOJ Revival of Civil Forfeiture Laws Means for Pennsylvania”
China is currently in the middle of reforming its healthcare system, a decision that will affect over 1.3 billion people for years to come. Moving from historically state-sponsored care to market-oriented care and now to a combination of the two, China has struggled to find a structure that works for its diverse population. Public health problems carry important implications for political stability. Thus far, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has relied on performance-based legitimacy to secure its own political future. Only by constantly improving social welfare and economic growth does the CCP reinforce its own authority. However, China’s slowing economic growth means that the government can no longer ignore institutional failures, such as its healthcare system, that are beginning to bring its legitimacy into question.[1. William C. Hsiao, “The Political Economy of Chinese Health Reform,” Health Economics, Policy and Law 2, no. 3 (2007): 241-247.
] With no institutional mechanism in place to address private grievances, increasing unrest over issues of medical impoverishment represent a threat to the CPP’s authority. Though China’s health care system has come a long way, there remain many challenges to overcome in order for China to compete with international standards and mitigate increasing discontent among Chinese citizens. Health insurance inequity, over-prescription of drugs, as well as environmental and food safety problems pose potential threats to China’s health care system and government stability. How the CCP resolves the issue of affordable health care and medical impoverishment could very well decide the fate of the CCP in China. Continue reading “One Billion Lives and Counting: The Future of China’s Health Care Policy”
Welcome to the Intercollegiate Law Journal (ILJ)! We are thrilled to create this collaborative platform for undergraduate students to focus on a range of legal and policy subject matters. We inhabit a unique space in the academic world and can offer equally unique analytical insight about some of today’s most pressing legal questions.
This group began as a partnership between the Claremont Journal of Law and Public Policy and the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, and rapidly expanded to include publications from across the United States and Canada. Our content will feature the highest quality, most thought-provoking pieces from each associated journal. In the spirit of collegiality, we remain happily open to other journals who may want to join in this collaboration, and urge readers to also visit our respective websites.
If you would like to submit your work to be considered for publication in one of our journals, please contact us individually and submit your work according to each publication’s guidelines.
The ILJ Inaugural Team